Fora Dirme!
comentada em 19/09/2016 21:34

#naovaitegópi

Valores Absolutos. Obviamente tem influência dos impostos, mas boa parte dessas empresas estão ganhando cada vez mais, assim aquela porcentagem que enviam para o exterior também está crescendo.

vc não entendeu elas não estão mandando mais para o exterior elas estão depositando mais no exterior fazendo mais reservas no exterior

Mas o pensamento é o mesmo,não? Elas estão com mais dinheiro no exterior(depositando ou enviando ). O que estou dizendo que suponha que a empresa A considere deixar 10% de seu caixa no exterior, como reserva, se esta aumenta seu caixa em valores absolutos, os 10% também irão aumentar em números absolutos. Não demonstra uma postura diferente em relação aos anos anteriores e sim um aumento de valores absolutos. O q estou falando que provavelmente está ocorrendo os dois.

#Gópicontraoestado

o dinheiro q eles ganham la fora eles estão mantendo la fora não estão trazendo para os EUA não estão enviando dos EUA para la não estão trazendo de la para os EUA

por exemplo a Microsoft ganhava X aqui no brasil e mandava quase tudo para os EUA agora ela deixa metade aqui depositado entendeu?

qual a vantagem de cobrar imposto de dinheiro que entra no país ? não seria mais lógico cobrar do dinheiro que sai do país ?

ta ai o texto The recent fight among Apple, Ireland, and the European Union has once again shined a spotlight on the growing trend of US companies storing cash overseas to avoid taxes. In fact, the amount of cash held by US-based companies in foreign countries hit a record $2.5 trillion in 2015, which is roughly 14% of the USs total GDP, according to Andrew Hunter, an economist at Capital Economics, who described the increase as companies "hoarding" cash overseas. Hunter notes that many firms are keeping the cash abroad to avoid the US's 35% corporate tax rate (though to be fair, companies are paying much less than that), which is the highest among developed market countries. Not all US firms are taking part in the shift, however, as the foreign cash is concentrated, for the most part, in a small group of firms in a small group of sectors. Here's Hunter (emphasis added): "Holdings of foreign cash are increasingly concentrated among a few large firms. Although Apple now has $91.5bn of earnings permanently reinvested overseas, it is not the biggest holder — General Electric and Microsoft have more than $100 billion each. "In addition, a disproportionate share of the total is still accounted for by firms in the technology and pharmaceutical sectors. Pharmaceutical firms now hold around 27% of the total, while the share accounted for by IT firms has risen to almost 40%, up from just 12% back in 2002." foreign cash COTD Capital Economics According to Hunter, if this cash were brought back to the US and invested by firms, it could be a significant economic boost. Unfortunately, despite some suggestions of one-time exemptions, tax rates as they stand now are too big of a discouragement in bringing back this cash — though there may be some possibility of a change after the presidential election in November. Additionally, the repatriation of cash has previously not brought about investments that would boost the economy and have instead been an indirect boost at best. In Hunter's opinion, the large domestic cash stockpiles show that companies are generally unwilling to invest in long-term projects, thus the repatriated cash probably wouldn't boost investment significantly. "Instead, evidence from a previous tax holiday in 2004 suggests that repatriated earnings would probably be returned to shareholders," Hunter wrote. "This would, however, provide an indirect boost to the economy, if shareholders then used the funds to increase consumption and the government spent its extra tax revenue."

Normalmente usa-se os impostos sobre a entrada de saída de recursos para controlar o fluxo de capital...ex.: IOF

Aprendi com o Bastter a não ler textos grandes como o que foi enviado acima pelo usuário Bast... Não, pera. :-)